logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.06.01 2016고단1353
민사집행법위반
Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 10, 2015, the defendant was sentenced to three years and six months for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) in Busan District Court's Dong Branch branch branch court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on April 12, 2016.

The Defendant, according to the Busan District Court’s decision on the property specification of the 200 million won claim against the victim D (200 million won), was present at the date for specification of the property and submitted a list of property specifying the property subject to compulsory execution. However, in order to avoid compulsory execution, the Defendant intentionally neglected claims and valuables from the list of property.

On March 2, 2015, around 15:00, the Defendant appeared at the date of specification of the property held in Busan District Court No. 101, 20, 112, the Busan District Court 20, the Busan District Court 101, the Busan District Court Branch 101, and submitted a list of property.

However, in the list of the property submitted by the Defendant on April 24, 2013, the amount of 115,245,631 won dividend under the self-distribution table on the building in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, which is the Defendant’s possession (the Busan District Court’s branch branch’s attachment No. 2012Kadan 2214), CT & &T of this Berne Investment Securities (the former Trad Securities) CMA account Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd.; the amount of 1,245 shares (0), 10,246,350 won worth of 10,245 shares (the former Trad Securities); securities held by a notary public from the law firm in writing on August 24, 2009; and the amount of 110,700,000 won was omitted as shown in the annexed list of crimes, such as bonds worth KRW 88,000,000,000.

Accordingly, the defendant submitted a false list of property on the date specified in the court's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A complaint-a copy of a process deed, a statement of decision on property specification, a statement of distribution, and a list of property;

1. A further complaint;

1. Responses to requests for financial transaction information and details of inquiries;

1. A written decision to issue a deposit prior to the gold, a whole certificate of registered matters, and a written decision to issue a collection order;

1. Investigation report (Submission of a copy of the fair deed) - Copy of the fair deed;

1. The investigation report (CT.).

arrow