1. The Defendant’s KRW 27,293,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from May 18, 2016 to July 1, 2019.

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, the main sentence of Article 150(3), and Article 150(1) [In Busan District Court Decision 2016Kahap10600, Jan. 9, 2017, the execution of duties by the defendant representative director and in-house director C, inside director D, and auditor E was suspended. February 2, 2017, the attorney F was appointed as the defendant representative director and in-house director C, as the representative director and in-house director D’s acting, and G was appointed as the defendant’s in-house director and in-house director D’s acting, and on December 22, 2017, the decision was rendered to revoke the appointment of the defendant’s in-house director and in-house director’s acting director’s acting. After Busan District Court Decision 2019Da971979 decided Dec. 22, 2017, Busan High Court Decision 2019Da27999 decided Feb. 21, 2017.

Ultimately, on July 1, 2019, a duplicate of the complaint of this case filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendant was served on August 30, 2019 on the date of pleading, and on October 4, 2019, the notification of the date of pronouncement was served on G’s spouse and G, a director of the Defendant’s intra-company director D, who was in the position of executive officer under the Defendant’s flexible law as of October 4, 2019. The Defendant did not submit a written reply disputing the cause of the claim even if the duplicate of the complaint of this case was served on the date of pleading. As such, the Plaintiff did not appear on the date of pleading, pursuant to Article 150(