A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 5, 2014, at around 23:15, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement of the noise level): (a) on the 23:15 p.m., the Defendant driven a PM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol in the west west west west west west, the front part of the said vehicle, which caused a traffic accident corresponding to the parking lot fence and street trees; and (b) sent to an emergency room in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, an emergency room in the U.S., a U.S., which was called upon upon receipt of the report, by taking measures of the 119 p.m. E; (c) there is considerable reason to recognize that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling at the Defendant’s entrance, and the rain distance, etc., was driven on March 6, 2014; (d) on March 6, 2014, the Defendant did not comply with a police officer’s request for alcohol measurement.

2. On March 6, 2014, the obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant: (a) around 00:20 on March 6, 2014, on the ground that the emergency room of the F Hospital requested a drinking test under the conditions as referred to in paragraph (1) of this Article; (b) the face part of the slope E (age 43) who is the victim was drinking at two times; (c) the bridge part of the above E was cut off on several occasions; (d) the bridge part of the bridge G where the bridge was avoided from the side; (d) the Defendant fright part of the above G’s face; and (e) the said brea part of the face part was taken one time with the Defendant’s horse, and assault the said G.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the police officers' legitimate performance of their duties concerning traffic accidents and the investigation of drinking driving accidents, and at the same time inflicted injury on E.

3. On March 6, 2014, the Defendant damaged public goods: (a) managed and used by the Yangsan Police Station D Boxes at the Yangsan Police Station around 01:10; and (b) on the ground that the Defendant was subject to examination of the case, such as obstruction of performance of official duties, refusal of taking a alcohol test, etc. of the Defendant as stipulated in paragraphs (1) and (2), by the Yangsan Police Station that is kept in that place