Defendant - [2017 High Order 4882] The details of the tax in arrears of each individual as stated in the [Attachment 2017 High Order 482] are re-written five times each year.

Punishment of the crime

On July 17, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor and three years of suspended execution due to occupational embezzlement at the Seoul Central District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 9, 2016.

The defendant is a representative director of the AP company AP located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government who employs 60 full-time workers and runs a sports relay business.

The Defendant, on December 1, 2015, worked for the said company on December 1, 2015, and did not pay KRW 10,376,579 in total, including KRW 974,214, as well as wages for Q retired workers on May 17, 2016, within 14 days from the date of the occurrence of each payment cause, without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment date.

From January 15, 2016 to May 29, 2016, the Defendant did not pay KRW 2,583,30 of the wages of two workers, including the payment of KRW 4,226,720, respectively, of the total wages of two workers, as shown in the attached Table 3,5 years in arrears, as shown in the attached Table 3,5 years in arrears, without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment date.

around April 28, 2010, the Defendant paid KRW 50 million to the victim ATU that was known through the introduction of the branch in the office of AT corporation located on the second floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government AS building on the second floor of AS building. The Defendant would receive KRW 50 million of the lease deposit deposit around July 16, 2010, the expiration date of the lease term of the company operation.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, it was difficult for the company to pay money to the injured party, even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party, because there was no deposit remaining after the monthly income deduction from the rent deposit, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money.

The defendant shall belong to his seat from the damaged person to the name of the defendant.