logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.10.07 2020나304992
손해배상(기)
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following parts and the judgment as set forth in paragraph (2) below. Thus, this part is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The part in the judgment of the court of first instance is based on the “detailed statement of contract” of each of the subparagraphs 1, 12, and 4 as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

② Each “Evidence Nos. 3 and 4 of the first instance judgment,” respectively, shall be deemed “Evidence Nos. 3 and 4 of the first instance judgment.”

③ Each “Evidence No. 3” of the first instance judgment No. 4, 8, and 11, shall be deemed as “Evidence No. 4.”

2. The addition;

A. The Plaintiff’s grounds of appeal ① was to construct the third and fourth floor columns and the fourth floor beams on the design drawing, but the Defendant constructed the bearing wall without the Defendant’s own construction.

E, a field manager of the instant construction, as the Defendant’s employee, notified G, an architectural firm employee, of the design modification without consultation with the Plaintiff, the design of the bearing wall structure was modified on the completion drawing.

However, the Plaintiff was unable to know that the design was modified as a whole due to the lack of the ability to view the construction drawings as a whole.

② The design drawings consisting of six toilets for the first floor, but the Defendant actually constructed only four toilets, and accordingly, partially constructed sewage pipes and commercial water supply and drainage holes.

③ The Plaintiff requested the Defendant to immediately connect water supply because it is likely to run the water tank in winter. However, the Defendant connected water supply using a valve.

④ Although the excellent pipes in the design drawings are constructed inside the building, the defendant constructed the building so that the excellent pipes can be exposed to the outside at will.

B. The Plaintiff’s aforementioned assertion (1) stated in the first instance judgment regarding the Plaintiff’s assertion, and the purport of the entire pleadings as to each of the aforementioned evidence.

arrow