logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.02.19 2018누61217
공무상요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff in the trial does not differ significantly from the argument in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's assertion even if the evidence additionally submitted in the trial was newly examined, is recognized as legitimate.

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance except for the following "2. height". Thus, the court's explanation on this case is as follows: Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act cites it as it is. 2. On the 3rd part of the judgment of the first instance, "Nos. 6, 7, 9, 10" shall be deemed as "Nos. 6 through 10". On the 3rd part of the judgment of the first instance, "Nos. 6, 7, 9, 10, and 4" shall be deemed as "Nos. 14, 4, 4, 200, 300, 2000, 4, 3000, 200, 4,0000, 300,0000, 200,000.

arrow