logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.10.26 2016가합31275
기타(금전)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. The facts below the facts of recognition may be found either in dispute between the parties or in each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4 through 6, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) by integrating the whole purport of the pleadings.

The Plaintiff Company A (the former trade name before the change: D; hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff Company”) is a company established mainly with the objective of indoor construction, housing construction, construction appraisal, etc., and the Defendant was the representative director of the Plaintiff Company from the time of its incorporation to December 30, 2009, and the Plaintiff B is the current representative director of the Plaintiff Company.

B. Plaintiff B and Nonparty E Co., Ltd. 1) Plaintiff B are separate corporations that the Defendant was the representative director, and Nonparty E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”).

) On December 28, 2009, the non-party company borrowed a total of KRW 90,500,000 from the following sources, stating that “Plaintiff B borrowed a total of KRW 90,500,000 from the non-party company as follows, and Plaintiff B promises to repay on the date designated by the non-party company (hereinafter “the instant loan certificate”).

On March 17, 008, 200. 5,000,000. 24. 2,500,000,008. 6. 20,000,000, July 16, 2009, the company filed an appeal with the Seoul District Court for the return of 10,000,000,000 won to the Plaintiff on July 28, 2008. 3,00,000,000,000 on July 31, 2009. 10,000,000,000,000 on August 17, 18, 200, 200, 300,000 won and 4,000,000 won and 5,000,000 won and 5,000,000 won and 5,00537,005,00.

arrow