(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.04.12 2012고정2642

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.04.12 2012고정2642

업무방해

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the chairman of the committee for emergency countermeasures against apartments E-gu Daejeon, and Defendant B is the member of the committee for emergency measures, and Defendant C is the same representative of the above apartment unit 205 unit.

On May 14, 2012, the victim F was elected at the representative meeting of the occupants of the above apartment, and the entrustment contract for the management of the existing entrusted management service business company Daeung Construction Co., Ltd. is terminated on June 30, 2012, the victim F decided on June 5, 2012 to hold the council of occupants' representatives to exclude the new entrusted management company from the selection of the entrusted management service company, and held the site site conference on June 11, 2012 after publicly notifying the selection of the entrusted management service company on June 8, 2012.

On June 11, 2012, the Defendants conspired that the victim would not hold the site site conference on the grounds that the victim would not hold the site site conference without consultation with the audit and inspection, and entered the council of occupants' representatives of apartment complexes management offices around 20:00 on June 11, 2012, the Defendants: (a) decided that the victim would not hold the site site conference; and (b) decided that the victim would not hold the site site conference; (c) Defendant A would have caused the victim to “whether the chairperson of Nsonson, the chief of the extraordinary session, would have caused the false remarks; and (d) “I am only before he leads to the truth that there is no qualification for the victim; and (d) the representative of the company participating in the site site conference,” and “I am again made the victim’s temporary meeting to the extent that the victim would interfere with the entrusted management of the victim’s affairs,” and (d) the Defendant B made the victim’s “Irson’s temporary meeting” to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Trial records of the first and second trial records:

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2013.11.06 2013노951

-서울남부지방법원 2013.05.21 2013고정596

-부산지방법원동부지원 2019.05.14 2017가단215911

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2021.02.09 2019가단70763

-대구지방법원 2020.04.22 2019고정1074