The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds of appeal (misunderstanding of facts and legal principles) is whether the Defendants’ act of posting a banner stating that the Defendants’ act of putting it up “influoring away from the G Einvina that encouragess residents’ unfortude by mobilization of violent services,” and “defluences influence and fluoring of a tin-open-open group” constitutes defamation of the victim’s reputation by pointing out false facts.

In full view of the following circumstances, the court below found the Defendants not guilty of the facts charged of this case, which erred by misapprehending the legal principles or misconceptions of the facts, although the Defendants acknowledged that they had damaged the reputation of the victim by clearly stating false facts.

A. The expression “influence of violent services” or “influor group” is an expression that leads to a group of fluences with the use of violence, thereby cutting the victim’s employees into an electronic device, etc.

In light of the general public, the above expression is likely to be mistaken for the other party to use physical and direct violence, and it does not go through a little or exaggerated expression, but is obviously false.

B. In addition, the expressions posted on the franchise card as above belong to the hospital operated by the injured party, and also constitutes false facts.

(c)

The service mobilized by the victim did not use physical violence, and the use of expressions such as the statement in the facts charged does not coincide with objective facts, even though the above service mobilization does not directly relate to the victim’s operating hospital.

Although the Defendants stated the false facts about the victim as they were conclusive facts, the Defendants stated them.

Therefore, the intention of defamation against victims is sufficiently recognized.

2. The summary of the facts charged in this case Defendant A is the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.