Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 27, 2014, the Defendant stated that “E was trying to go out of this Chapter, and the cost of remuneration for male senior citizens center was dried up at the place where 52 community residents were present prior to the presidential election of the head of the Gu,” at the D community center located in Gunam-gun C around 11:00.

However, there was no fact that the defendant stolen the remuneration cost for male citizen center or committed it in mind.

Nevertheless, the Defendant openly damaged the reputation of the victim by pointing out false facts as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the respective statutory statements made by witnesses E, F, G and H to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The portion not guilty under Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. On December 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 11:00 on the 27th day of the charge, at the D community hall located in the Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-gun; and (b) at the place where fifty-two village residents were present prior to the election of this Chapter, the Defendant stated that “E was a person who received support expenses for village projects by forging private documents related to high voltage lines at the Korea War and using them as a person who received support expenses for village projects.”

However, in fact, the “application for the resident joint assistance project” related to the high voltage line before Korea was forged because the victim took part with the consent of the nominal owner or the nominal owner took part with the consent of the nominal owner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant openly damaged the reputation of the victim by pointing out false facts as above.

2. The defendant asserts that he did not have any signature from some of the nominal holders of the letter of appointment of the representative of residents, and that he had talked about forgery at the village conference, and that he did not have any intention to make any false facts at least.

In this Court, the author, the witness I (E's mother), and the J stated that they do not permit them to sign or sign the above documents, and on Nos. 2 and 3 (including paper numbers) submitted by the defense counsel.