logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.08.25 2016고단1907
명예훼손
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the D apartment reconstruction and consolidation project association office located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju; and (b) D reconstruction apartment E “F directors and G representatives put up 500 million won by the second negotiation.”

In the third negotiation, while asserting that there is a direct cause for the union to cause a loss of at least KRW 150,000,000 and at least KRW 800,00,000 to the union, it is demanded to make a special audit and to immediately dismiss the union.

The certificate of content was sent to the effect that “......”

However, there is no fact that the victim F presented a negotiation price of at least KRW 800 million when it calls for crime prevention plans and resettlement support services, and the conference was formed by the deliberation council for the conclusion of the service contract to determine KRW 770,000 as the service cost, and the victim claimed KRW 26,500,000, rather than the defendant claimed KRW 28,000.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On January 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) prepared a certification of the foregoing content at the place indicated in the preceding paragraph; and (b) displayed 59 representatives G et al. with a smelled to 59 persons, thereby undermining the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second pleading);

1. Statement made to F in the police statement protocol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to certification of contents and recording books;

1. Article 307 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 307 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.

arrow