logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.12.03 2014고단2523
재물손괴
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won, by imprisonment of 8 months, and by a fine of 3,00,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendants are close to that of ordinary people. The defendants are close to that of ordinary people.

1. On October 13, 2014, Defendant A: (a) around 22:30 on October 13, 2014, at the “I” entertainment tavern operated by the victim H in Seongbuk-gu G, Sung-gu, Sungnam-gu, with B and C, the Defendant was dissatisfied with each other while drinking together with B and C; and (b) destroyed the number plate of the musical instruments at the market price, which is the victim’s ownership.

2. Defendant B

A. In a case where the Defendant, at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1) above, she was able to take a shelter from the victim L, who was called out after receiving a report from the employees J of the above main point in the Sungnam Police Station K District, and the Defendant insultingd the victim by openly exposing the victim with a large voice, “I will receive money from the relevant personnel of the above main point, such as M and H, and police officers of the victim, who are in custody of the victim, for the same reason and at the same time and place as above paragraph (1) above.”

나. 공무집행방해 피고인은 위 1항과 같은 일시, 장소에서 흥분하여 고성을 지르며 소란을 피우다가 성남중원경찰서 K지구대 소속 경사 N로부터 제지당하자, 위 N에게 생수병을 집어던지고, 피고인을 공무집행방해 현행범인으로 체포하려는 위 지구대 소속 경사 O에게 “씹새끼, 개새끼”라고 욕을 하면서 위 O의 얼굴에 침을 뱉고 발로 위 O의 오른쪽 종아리를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer on the handling of 112 reports.

3. Defendant C expressed his desire to arrest the above B as a flagrant offender committing an obstruction of performance of official duties, at the same time, at the same place, at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1) above and paragraph (2) above, to the above slopeO, “The police sent a large voice, i.e., why she would arrest her friend, spath, and come to her friend, and her friend.”

Accordingly, the defendant is justified in relation to the arrest of a flagrant offender by the police officer.

arrow