The judgment of the first instance shall be reversed.

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of KRW 3,00,000.

The above fine shall be imposed on the defendant.

1. misunderstanding of the gist of the grounds for appeal (as to the fraud, the defendant provided sufficient security to the extent exceeding 47,00,000 won actually to the victim H, so it shall not be deemed to have obtained the loan money from the victim by deceiving the victim with the intent to commit the crime of fraud) and unfair sentencing. 2. The judgment of this court

A. Various circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the first instance court as to the assertion of mistake of facts, namely, ① on June 23, 201, the Defendant borrowed KRW 50,000,00 from the victim (47,000,000,000, which was actually paid after deducting interest) and promised the Defendant to offer the leased vehicle to be refunded from the lessorF as security, and ② the Defendant merely borrowed money from the victim and said money was in arrears only for 2 to 3 months for a relatively short period of 2 to 3 months, but the actual lease deposit was not more than 39,000,000,000, and the victim’s phone number was more than 30,000,000,000,000, which was later than 30,000,0000,0000, which was the victim’s phone number for the use of the leased vehicle.