The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that the Defendant was aware of KRW 50 per month as stated in the instant lease agreement at the time of the instant complaint, and thus, did not have any awareness that the details of the instant complaint were false.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below was erroneous by misunderstanding facts, which affected the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below's duly adopted and investigated evidence: the defendant was present at the site at the time of the formation of the lease contract of this case; the defendant's denial of the party to the lease contract of this case and the lessor D agreed to receive KRW 4,50,000 per month until December 2009; accordingly, the tenant's husband to the account of D, who is the tenant of this case, was the tenant of this case, and the tenant of this case, and the tenant of this case was 50,000 won per month from June 2009 to December 201; it was stated that the tenant of this case's lease contract of this case was 50,000 won per month from 50,000 won per month from 200 to 500,000 won per month from 50,000 won per month from 205,000 won per month after the alteration of the lease contract of this case.