beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 25, 2015, the Defendant was a person who has maintained a de facto marital relationship with D from November 2002, and around March 25, 2015, the Defendant stated D as “D” and “D” in the column for wife of the parties to the marriage (reported) at the Defendant’s residence located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E 109 Dong 1106, and was in custody of D’s seal affixed thereon, and even though he was aware that D’s intent to report the marriage was withdrawn, the Defendant was able to unilaterally report the marriage by using the above marriage report for the purpose of submitting the family relation register stating the fact of marriage with D at the Defendant’s workplace.
1. On June 8, 2015, the Defendant forged private documents, or uttering of the above investigation documents, indicated in the Seongdong-gu civil service center of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 270, that “F.”, “G”, “Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, Ha, 109-1106, and parents (parents)” in the column of “I, J.J, Daejeon, the Daejeon Metropolitan City Dae-gu K, L, M, the Daejeon Metropolitan City Dae-gu, and the witness column, stating that “N, O, Seoul, P. 106-712”, “ Q, Gyeonggi-do, and R. R. 301-1702”, “A public official who is a public service center, who is a public official in charge of public service, was unable to know the fact of forgery of the marriage report.”
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of the marriage report in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and exercised it.
2. Around June 8, 2015, the Defendant submitted a forged marriage report at the Seongdong-gu Office’s public service center as described in paragraph (1) of the foregoing Article to a public official in charge of the foregoing paragraph (1) and made him/her enter it into and register as a married one with the Defendant and D in a family relations register information processing device, and stored and operated it.
This is the defendant.