logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.01.19 2017고단1488
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 1488"

1. The Defendant, while proceeding to purchase land with respect to the land redevelopment project of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seongdong-gu 1, did not immediately proceed with the purchase of land on the premise that a major contractor would receive a letter of intent to participate in construction, such as a land purchase contract, a written consent to the formulation of an urban management plan, and a written consent to land use. As the name of the implementing contractor has been changed frequently, it was difficult for the Defendant to prepare a new land purchase contract, etc. with the prop as the name of the corporate entity was changed frequently, the Defendant forged relevant documents such as the land purchase contract, etc. on the basis of the consultation with the existing props, and sentenced him to exercise them.

On January 4, 2011, the Defendant: (a) stated in the column for indication of real estate in the real estate purchase and sale contract using a tample on the paper of the real estate purchase and sale contract using a tample on the paper of the real estate purchase and sale contract; (b) stated in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the total amount of the purchase and sale; and (c) stated “F” in the seller column;

F's seal was stamped by his name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a real estate transaction contract in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations.

In addition, from June 26, 2010 to April 7, 2012, the Defendant, as shown in Appendix I, committed each of the following offenses: F and 49 real estate trading contracts with 48 persons, respectively.

2. “Written consent to the drafting of an urban management plan” means that “The Defendant consents to the designation of a district unit planning zone and the establishment of a district unit planning with respect to the land owned by the consenters,” at an influent place on October 26, 2012,” the purport of which is “a consent to the formulation of a new urban management plan,” is to indicate land with the consent to the drafting of an urban management plan by using a tample on the written consent to the drafting of the urban management plan printed.”

arrow