1. The Defendant’s KRW 93,250,90 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from June 10, 2016 to October 24, 2017.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: C - Public notice: The defendant: D public notice of April 2, 2010 of Gyeonggi-do, E publicly notice of April 9, 2013, Gyeonggi-do public notice of March 28, 2012, G public notice of Gyeonggi-do on April 10, 2014;

(b) The adjudication of expropriation made on April 25, 2016 by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on expropriation - The expropriation object is 1,783 square meters prior to H in king-si owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant land”); 980 square meters in Mataccccua, 5 weeks in vacua, 5 weeks in vacua, 5 weeks in vacua, 5 weeks in vacua, 5 weeks in vacuacuacua, 1,00 (hereinafter “instant trees”); obstacles - The expropriation commencement date: ① Compensation for losses on June 9, 2016 - ① the instant land: 1,174,105, 500 won in terms of the instant trees and obstacles; ② 115,450,000 won in terms of the instant trees and obstacles to the appraisal corporation; The Vice Governor of the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation and the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation among the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Appraisal Corporation”).

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on January 19, 2017 - Details of the ruling: 1,219,572,00 won of the compensation for losses for the instant land; and 119,235,000 won of the compensation for losses for the instant trees (excluding the part on the stolen property); - An appraisal corporation: Central Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Central Appraisal Corporation”); and an appraisal corporation for the first day of a stock company (hereinafter “appraisal”)

D. As a result of the appraiser I’s market price appraisal of the instant land - Contents of appraisal: Compensation for losses for the instant land at KRW 1,312,822,90 (hereinafter “court’s land appraisal”)

E. Results of the appraiser J’s appraisal of the instant trees - Contents of the appraisal: Evaluation of the transfer cost of KRW 280,000,000 for the instant trees (hereinafter “judgment of trees by the court”) [based on recognition]; the facts that there is no dispute; Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1 through 4; appraiser I and J’s evaluation results; the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. Determination

A. The plaintiffs' assertion.