1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

(a) project approval and public notice - Road project approval and public notice - Public notice: C on June 27, 2005, and public notice D on January 30, 2015; the Seoul Regional Construction and Management Administration:

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation by August 20, 2015 - The Plaintiff’s compensation for losses for trees on the ground, such as E and F, on the land owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant trees”), shall be KRW 200,275,500. Of them, the date of commencement of expropriation: G appraisal corporation and H appraisal corporation: G appraisal corporation and H appraisal corporation.

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on January 21, 2016 - The Plaintiff’s compensation for the trees of this case shall be KRW 204,620,000 (hereinafter “adjudication appraisal”). - An appraisal corporation: I appraisal corporation and J appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal”)

D. On May 13, 2016, the appraiser K (hereinafter “court appraiser”) submitted the appraisal report that calculated the Plaintiff’s compensation for trees of this case as KRW 514,77,909 (hereinafter “the first court appraisal”) as of May 13, 2016 - With respect to the first court appraisal, this court made an inquiry to the appraiser on whether “the establishment of the standards for compensation for losses and 2015, which are the evidentiary materials when calculating the amount of compensation, is the materials officially published by the Rural Development Administration.” On June 29, 2016, the court appraiser made an appraisal report based on the appraisal report, which was submitted to the Rural Development Administration’s research service task report, based on which it was officially published. Accordingly, the appraisal report applying the method again was submitted along with the inquiry inquiry reply to the effect that “the first appraisal report applying the method of compensation for the trees of this case as KRW 729,590,510 (hereinafter “the court appraisal report”).

[Reasons for Recognition]