Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On September 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud and two years of suspended execution at the Incheon District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on September 28, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant of "2013 Highest 463" is a person who has no fixed occupation.

On December 19, 201, from around 19:40 to around 22:10, 201, from around 19:40 to around 22:10, from around 40, 201, the victim E (n, 39 years of age) who is the owner of the PC within the fourth floor of the building C, had no intent or ability to pay the PC usage fee, but has used the PC for about 50 hours at the 44th place inside the above PC and used it, the PC would be believed to have been able to receive the price, and would have been 44,800 won.

"2013 Highest 1286" Defendant did not pay 12,700 won for using the Internet game by deceiving the victim as if he were to pay the completion price to the victim, despite the absence of the intent or ability of the victim G on the ground that the victim G was on the ground of the HPC located in the Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan City from 18:05 on January 30, 2013 to 04:38 on January 31, 2013.

In this respect, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired property benefits equivalent to the above amount of use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of each of the accused in court;

1. E. G All statements;

1. Screening pictures and photographs of cryp, report on each investigation, and picture of cryp;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports on criminal records, etc., criminal records, and prior records of each disposition, and reporting results of confirmation;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order are different from that of the defendant, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case even though the defendant was in the previous period of probation, and each of the crimes of this case is committed in light of the method, etc.