A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the representative of “D” (the change of name to “E” around October 2012), which is a food processing business establishment in Chungcheongnam-si, and is a person who works to supply string dust, galves, and galves to a military unit distribution station located across the country.

On April 20, 2011, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Defense Acquisition Program Administration to supply a quantity equivalent to KRW 102,181,500 for a shoulder 102,181,50 with a water content of less than 2.7%. In order to supply a shoulder to a military unit, the Defendant submitted a food test report to the Defense Technology and Quality Agency that the water content of the shoulder would meet the above contract terms and conditions and received “F”.

However, around July 25, 2011, the Defendant received a food test report from the Food Research Center of the Suwon National Food Research Center of Suwon National University, which is 3.36% of the water content of the above shoulder dust, and was unable to obtain the above “F”. The Defendant changed the part of the food test report and supplied the shoulder dust to the military unit, and sentenced the Defendant to acquire pecuniary benefits equivalent to the supplied shoulder content.

1. On July 27, 2011, the Defendant changed a private document to the foregoing D office, and ordered employees in non-name to change the content of the food test report to less than 2.7%, and sent it by facsimile to the Agency for Technology and Quality Technology and Quality Assurance. The employees in non-name changed the food test report to 1.36% “3.36% of the amount recorded in the food test report.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant modified one food test report under the name of the Food Analysis Center in the Suwon Women's University, which is a private document related to confirmation of facts.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in Paragraph 1, sent the altered food test report to G by facsimile as if he/she knew of the fact that the aforementioned altered food test report had been duly formed to G, a person in charge of issuing the Technology and Quality Assurance F, by means of facsimile.

3. The accused is the date and time stated in paragraph (1).