beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2014 Highest 3012]
1. On June 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around June 21, 2013, at the E office operated by the victim D with the victim D, the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, the Defendant delivered to the victim a note of promissory note amounting to KRW 59,50,000 for the purchase price, which is equivalent to the face value of KRW 59,80,000 for the face value issued by the said company; and (b) on the pretext of security, a note of promissory note amounting to KRW 59,80,000 for the face value issued by the said company, respectively.
However, this part of the above Promissory Notes issued by the Defendant was referred to as the “refluence note” issued by the non-member of the name, and the Defendant was aware of the fact that other promissory notes issued by the said non-member of the name-based company of the said company engaged in the interest industry were immediately faced with the insolvency crisis, and thus, the above promissory notes were also known to the effect that the said promissory notes would be the date of the bankruptcy. Moreover, even if the Defendant did not own the assets
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was supplied with steel materials equivalent to the market value of KRW 46,300,000 at around that time from the victim, and acquired them by transfer of KRW 13,50,000 to the corporate bank account in the name of F on July 31, 2013.
2. On October 26, 2013, the Defendant issued a copy of a promissory note in the face value of KRW 100,000,000 issued by G, stating that, at the same place of the foregoing paragraph (1) at the same time, the Defendant would give another bill on behalf of the unprocessed bills, and at the same time, when the two bills under the foregoing paragraph (1) at the place of the foregoing paragraph (1) were in default, the Defendant would give another bill on behalf of the unprocessed bills, thereby deducting the difference between KRW 46,30,000 and KRW 13,50,000.
However, the above promissory note issued by the Defendant was a bearer note issued by the bearer, and the Defendant promised to distribute the discounted amount of the said promissory note to the bearers.