logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.10.12 2012고단2862
유가증권위조등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

Defendant No. 3 of seized evidence.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul East Eastern District Court on July 7, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence in Seongdong-gu District Court on August 20, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant A purchased forged bills from the name infavour box (title H) who sells infavour forged bills at the request of G to request for harming the bill, with intent to sell forged bills to G to KRW 500,000,000 in the price, and exercised the same four times as follows.

In the middle of July 2011, the Defendant: (a) delivered one promissory note, the issuer J, due date of payment, October 15, 201; (b) the par value of which is KRW 35 million, to G; and (c) delivered one promissory note, the issuer J, due date of payment, October 26, 201; and (d) the face value of which is KRW 37 million, to G at the same place as at the end of July 201, the Defendant issued one copy of the promissory note at the same place as at the end of July 2011, the Defendant issued to G, and delivered one copy of the promissory note, the issuer K, the payment date of which is KRW 2,00,000,000,000 to G, and around September 20, 2011, to the issuer, L, the payment date of which is at the same place as at the same time as at the same time.

2. Defendant A’s co-principal committed a newspaper advertisement that Defendant B lent the bill from the above G upon the request of the above G to request for the compensation of the bill, and that Defendant B purchased the bill from the above party, the name of the representative director of the issuer, M representative director N, issue date and par value of the promissory note whose face value is blank, was affixed with the seal of the representative director of the M representative director, and sold it to G.

On May 17, 2012, in the vicinity of the foregoing I, Defendant A ordered seals from the seal collection to be affixed to the name of the representative director of M, Co., Ltd. Defendant B, in contact with Defendant B, who brought the said promissory note under contact with Defendant A, and the Defendants were also the issuer of the said promissory note as “N’s representative director of M, Co., Ltd.” and Defendant A stamped the said seal.

arrow