1. The defendant,

A. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 53,163,100 and KRW 1,00,000 among them, from July 17, 2013 to May 22, 2014.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

(a) Business approval and announcement - Housing site development project: - Public announcement of the housing site development project (K site development zone 2: The defendant: L published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on December 31, 2008, M announced on April 5, 2012, N announced on December 24, 2012;

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on May 23, 2013 (hereinafter “instant ruling of expropriation”): Compensation targets: The Plaintiff, B, D, E, H, I, and J (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Plaintiff and seven persons”) owned by the Plaintiff, A, A, H, I, and J (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff”) and the Plaintiff’s Social Welfare Foundation F (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff F”), and the Plaintiff Company G (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff G”)’s compensation for losses incurred from the business operation of each land indicated in the “subject to expropriation” in the table 1 below.

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation on July 16, 2013 - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation at sight and a national appraisal corporation;

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on April 17, 2014 (hereinafter “instant objection”): The subject of compensation: The land of the instant case owned by the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff F, and the compensation for losses incurred by the Plaintiff F, and G’s business: The compensation for losses is as indicated in the table 1 below.

- Certified public appraisal corporations: Dive appraisal corporations and central appraisal corporations;

D. The result of the appraisal commission to the appraiserO of this court and the fact inquiry result (hereinafter “court appraisal”): The land of this case owned by the plaintiff et al. and the plaintiff F, and G's compensation for losses from the plaintiff et al. - The contents of appraisal: The compensation for losses from each of the land of this case, the compensation for losses from the plaintiff F, and G's business are as follows.

However, with respect to Plaintiff B, C, and D, Q land (hereinafter “P land”) is recognized as forest land by recognizing the current status of the P land at the time of strike (hereinafter “P land”).