A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 2019, the Defendant: (a) searched a manufacturer of a motor vehicle registration certificate on the Internet, and requested an employee under his/her name to forge the motor vehicle registration certificate on the Internet; (b) stated “B” in the vehicle registration number column, “S350dL” in the name column, and “C” in the name column; and (c) affixed the seal on the back of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government head of Seongdong-gu Office, Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant carried the forged motor vehicle registration certificate file on the e-mail and printed it out.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one motor vehicle registration certificate in the name of the head of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is a public document, for the purpose of exercising in collusion with the person who has

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, sent a forged official document by facsimile as if the registration certificate, which was a forged official document, was actually issued to D and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement D in the suspect examination protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A forged motor vehicle certificate;

1. In the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (over-the-counter telephone conversations), investigation reports (in the case of confirmation and attachment of the original registration certificate of this case), and accompanying materials;

1. Articles 225 and 30 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In full view of the following circumstances and the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, etc. under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Probation, etc. Act, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all of the factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of

Unfavorable circumstances: Social importance is to prove automobile ownership, etc.