A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 03:20 on February 1, 2015, the Defendant driven a Dworka car under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.151% from the 1km section of approximately 1km to the c convenience store in the same city from the smell fluora road in Gumi-si, Gumi-si to the c convenience store in the same city.

2. In the case of obstruction of special performance of official duties and damage to special public items, the Defendant was under the influence of two police officers, such as a slopeF belonging to the police box of the previous U.S. police station, who was dispatched to the site after receiving 112 report that the Defendant was driving at the time of the above rocketing car, at the top of the above C convenience point as set forth in paragraph 1.

In order to block the defendant's escape route, the above F was driven by the G patrol vehicle to stop the driver's seat next to the driver's seat of the rocketing car, and then the defendant stopped three times, "the driver's seat of the vehicle has been reported." However, the defendant refused to stop the operation of the vehicle, and the defendant's defect who the F was intending to open and get the driver's seat of the vehicle patrol at the right side of the vehicle patrol, moving back to the right side of the vehicle patrol, making the driver's seat of the vehicle under the direction of the vehicle under the direction of the vehicle under the direction of the vehicle under the direction of the vehicle under the direction of the rocketing and the driver's seat of the vehicle under the direction of the driver's seat, and prevented the F from getting off the vehicle from the patrol, and damaged the vehicle under the direction of the repair cost of the 1,637,326 won, such as the exchange of the vehicle under the direction.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a vehicle, which is a dangerous object, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes, and at the same time damaged the objects used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. An investigation report (from 34 to 37 pages of the investigation records), 1.