logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.03.07 2016고정1330
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a space between the victim E and operating the "D Public Notice Board" in Si interest City C.

1. The Defendant, around June 20, 2012, at the place of the 'G located in F in Silung City F in which the victim works on June 20, 2012, is unable to set off the victim the building due to the leakage of the building.

If the building is repaired by borrowing KRW 2 million, the building will be repaired and the security deposit will be paid.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, at the time, the Defendant was liable for the debt amounting to KRW 1.3 billion to the Saemaul Bank, such as having a loan obligation equivalent to KRW 1.2 billion to the Saemaul Bank, and was thought to use the money for the cost of living due to the lack of living expenses. Therefore, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repair the building with the said money and receive the lease deposit.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received cash of KRW 2 million from the damaged party on his/her job as a loan, and received KRW 1 million around the 22th of the same month from the damaged party in cash.

2. On June 2012, the Defendant provided the Defendant with a registration certificate, etc. of the building in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant who was the owner of the building in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant in the Republic of Korea, Sinsi-si, Singu around the end of June.

“A false statement” was made.

However, at the time, the Defendant was liable for the debt amounting to KRW 1.3 billion to the Saemaul Bank, such as having a loan obligation equivalent to KRW 1.2 billion to the Saemaul Bank, and was thought to use the money for the cost of living due to the lack of living expenses. Therefore, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repair the building with the said money and receive the lease deposit.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received cash of KRW 10 million from the damaged party on his/her job as the borrowed money.

(i) the evidence;

arrow