logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.02.12 2015고단3459
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around March 17, 2014, the Defendant committed a crime on March 17, 2014, at the 9th century located in the Dong-dong-dong Dong-dong Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-

If a person lends KRW 30 million to another person, he/she shall make an investment in and grant a profit, and the principal shall be returned only before one month.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendant, as a recipient of basic living costs, did not have a certain property or occupation, was thought to use the money received from the injured party as living costs, and there was no reason to proceed with the freezing business. Therefore, even if he received the money from the injured party as a loan, he did not have any intent or ability to repay the money.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; and (b) received from the injured party a delivery of KRW 10 million for the borrowed money in its own name; and (c) KRW 30 million for the check.

2. On October 17, 2014, the Defendant of the crime committed around October 17, 2014, at a point where the foreign exchange bank located in Ilyang-dong, Youngdong-gu, Youngdong-gu, Ilyang-gu, Mayang-si, is to repay to the said victim B the same amount as KRW 30 million first borrowed if the Defendant borrowed an additional amount of KRW 20 million as the revenue of the freezing business.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendant, as a recipient of basic living costs, did not have a certain property or occupation, was thought to use the money received from the injured party as living costs, and there was no reason to proceed with the freezing business. Therefore, even if he received the money from the injured party as a loan, he did not have any intent or ability to repay the money.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was given 20 million won a check in front of the victim himself/herself as the borrowed money from the damaged party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol B of the police statement with regard to B

arrow