A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

A seized gas sprayers shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

[2016 senior group 4065] The Defendant decided to newly construct an aggregate building on the site located in E and E and E Government-si, G, H, I, and J. However, the method of financing KRW 1.3 billion for the construction cost to be paid to the construction business operator who newly built the aggregate building without any particular property is insufficient to secure the total amount of KRW 1.36 billion, and thus, even if the Defendant borrowed the above money from the damaged party as above, there was no intention or ability to repay the money from the damaged party due to the lack of actual value of collateral, and there was no intention or ability to create a mortgage if the above new aggregate was newly constructed, not only the method of financing KRW 1.3 billion for the construction business operator who newly built the aggregate building but also the method of financing KRW 1,927,00,000.

1. Nevertheless, on March 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) lent KRW 170 million to the victim of a building project in F on the site of the building project in F; and (b) newly constructing an aggregate building, thereby creating a first priority right to collateral security; and (c) thereby, creating a second priority right to collateral security.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

On March 18, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 100,000 from the damaged party to the account in the name of M, a partner of the said condominium L, and KRW 70,000,000 from the account in the name of M on March 20, 2013.

2. Nevertheless, on December 19, 2013, the Defendant borrowed an aggregate building that is scheduled to be newly built as security from the victim at the construction site on December 19, 2013 or leased the aggregate building to be built as security, and then repaid within 20 days after the completion of the lease with the security deposit.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

The defendant is the defendant on December 19, 2013 from the damaged person.