A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 25, 2016, around 19:50, the Defendant: (a) took the same attitude to pay the drinking value in spite of the victim’s intent or ability to pay the drinking value, even if he/she was provided with the alcohol from the injured party; (b) ordered the injured party to provide the alcohol and the alcohol to the injured party; and (c) did not pay the said amount to the injured party at an amount equivalent to KRW 29,00,000 in total; and (d) did not pay the amount to the injured party even after having been provided with the alcohol and alcohol to the injured party.

2. At around 20:50 of the above day, the Defendant: (a) demanded the victim D (V, 52 years of age) to pay the drinking value; and (b) the victim expressed that “the victim did not have any money,” and (c) was her wall and cellular phone device at the victim’s seat, she expressed her desire to do so.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

3. At around 20:53 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at the top of the above main station, and at around 20:53 on the same day, after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant avoided disturbance without any drinking value, from G, the police officer of the police box of the Heung Police Station, who was in charge of the police box of the Heung Police Station, “Calculation of the drinking value and returning home”, the Defendant heard G, who heard the horses, “I am back to the floor of this sponse, I am sponse, while taking a bath to ambling, I am the chest with both hand.”

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted G and interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

4. In light of the above day at around 20:53, the Defendant destroyed the damage by breaking up the course G in front of the above main point, and then destroying one minute of the fire amounting to KRW 50,000,000 in the market price owned by the victim D, which is located adjacent to the above main point entrance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made in relation to D, H and G;

1. On-site evidence and photographs;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Criminal facts;