A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

On March 30, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court on March 30, 2017, and completed the enforcement of the sentence on June 7, 2017, and was subject to criminal punishment of 28 times in total for the same crime.

1. Habitual fraud;

A. On June 27, 2017, at around 01:30 on June 27, 2017, the Defendant placed an order for the alcohol equivalent to approximately KRW 750,00,00 for each of the above two weeks C, even though he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the alcohol value, and was delivered from the above victim’s seat.

B. On June 28, 2017, the Defendant, at around 22:00 on June 28, 2017, received alcoholic beverages and services equivalent to KRW 2.250,00,00 in total, including KRW 50,00 (1250,00), and KRW 7 (1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won

(c)

On July 8, 2017, the Defendant ordered the victim K, an employee, to provide approximately KRW 700,00,00,000, such as 2 Byung-ju, without any intent or ability to pay the alcohol value, at around 20:0,00 from July 8, 2017, the Defendant received the delivery from the said victim, i.e., the said victim., the Defendant.

(d)

On July 9, 2017, the Defendant ordered the “M main store” located in L on July 9, 2017, around 05:25, 2017, to the victim N who is an employee even though he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the drinking value, and ordered approximately KRW 850,000, such as two weeks, to the said victim N, who is an employee, to whom he/she was given a delivery from the said victim.

E. On July 13, 2017, the Defendant, at around 00:00 on July 13, 2017, issued an order for alcohol equivalent to approximately KRW 860,00,00, such as Yang 3 C, even though he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the alcohol value, and was delivered from the said victim’s seat.

Accordingly, the defendant is habitually above.