logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.11 2016누74981
일부 요양불승인처분 취소청구의소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the following contents among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

2. The following shall be added to the “accident” of the 6th parallel conduct:

5. The 14th page "regularly and clearly aspects" shall be changed to "regularly and clearly."

The following shall be added to 6th 7th 6th 7th 6th 7th 7th :

The Court’s appraisal had experienced the view that at least the time when the Plaintiff’s pleathy and pressure was inflicted on July 11, 2014. However, this is based on the result of the static radiation test on May 21, 2014 and July 11, 2014, and the above method of the examination is not appropriate for the determination of the Plaintiff’s pleathy condition. As such, it is difficult to accept the above view as it is, and in the case of pressure, the symptoms occur frequently, and in the case of the Plaintiff, it appears that the Plaintiff was unable to continue to perform the relevant work in a non-party company due to the disease of this case.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow