A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 15, 2018, around 21:35, at the front of the 7nd Dong office, Seocheon-ro 127, Seocheon-si, 127, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 that he does not pay the taxi fee; and (b) heard C that he would be able to pay the taxi fee and return home from the slope C belonging to the Seocheon-si Police Station B, Seocheon-gu, Hacheon-gu, B, the Defendant told C, “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a copy of the work site B;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing) of the suspended sentence (the following sentencing) is [the scope of recommendation] interference with the performance of official duties (from June to January 1), the basic area (the decision of sentencing) / [the decision of sentencing] is against the defendant's wrong. The circumstances of the crime in this case and the degree of interference with official duties, circumstances after the crime in this case, the defendant's age, sex behavior, criminal records, family relations, economic circumstances, etc. shall be comprehensively taken into account, and the sentence as ordered.