A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 1, 2017, from around 01:00 to 04:00, the Defendant received 112 reports while drinking alcohol from “C cafeteria” located in Pyeongtaek-si B, and sent to that place after receiving a report from 112, the Defendant heard that he would be able to pay food and return home from “the head of the Pyeongtaek-si Police Station D police box sent to that place.”

“The body of the police officer at his/her hand was pushed down with the body of the police officer at his/her hand, and her chest was fry.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted a police officer who was performing legitimate duties concerning the handling of 112 reports, thereby hindering the performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the recommended sentencing criteria) of the suspended sentence;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria - Scope of the recommended sentence: Class 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Compelling of Duties) that interferes with the performance of official duties;

2. It is ordered as ordered in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, including the first sentence decision, the degree of assault is minor, the circumstances leading to the instant crime, the Defendant’s attitude of reflectivity, etc.