1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 10, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) around 18:10, around Seongdong-gu Seoul (hereinafter “the date, time, place of this case”); (b) stated that the Defendant’s “Is the Defendant’s head in his/her hands while having a dispute with the Defendant with D’s head; (c) was able to take up the Defendant’s head; (d) the Defendant’s face and part of his/her face and part of his/her arms; (e) the Defendant was able to take up the Defendant’s head in his/her hand; (e) the Defendant was able to take up the face and part of his/her arms and legs; and (e) the Defendant was able to take approximately two weeks of medical treatment; and (e) the Defendant also her head was fluened over the floor of the Plaintiff’s head by putting the Plaintiff’s head on his/her hand; and (e) the Plaintiff’s face with his/her hand, the Plaintiff was placed in the diveal s

B. In addition, with five persons, including E and F, at the instant date and time, the Plaintiff voiced that “the Defendant her fluent and fluent entry into the house,” “I am fluently fluently fluently fluently fluently fluently fluently fluently fluently, if I fluently fluently fluently fluent, if I fluently fluently fluently fluent, I fluently fluently fluently fluent

However, the fact that the defendant was between the defendant and the head of the D association and the hotel or the inn, and that the defendant did not have to pay the plaintiff's property, so the fact that the plaintiff publicly stated the above facts was false.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence Nos. 1, 3, 12 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the main claim

A. (1) According to the fact that the defendant is liable for damages based on the above facts, the defendant is entitled to the above 1-A.

The plaintiff is liable to compensate for damages caused by the tort caused by injury to the port.

The plaintiff asserts that the defendant suffered bodily injury, such as sub-Section 4 of the left-hand body, which requires treatment for about five weeks by taking the plaintiff's hand in the course of fighting with the plaintiff's body at the time and place of this case, and therefore, according to the statements in the evidence Nos. 5 and 10, the plaintiff was examined.