A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On March 25, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for the crime of destroying property, etc. in the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon, and on November 11, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties in the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon Friwon, and on December 8, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties in the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon Friwon Friwon Friwon, and was sentenced to a fine of one million won for the crime of obstructing duties

Criminal facts

The Defendant, at around 21:40 on November 14, 2016, is the victim D (the age 52) who is the main business of the Defendant, the Defendant, at the Sungnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City B “C” restaurant, and the Defendant, at around 21:40 on November 14, 2016, was going to a abscison acison acison acison acison acison acison acison acison acison acison, and the Defendant, at the same time, is the string and the victim, who is the head of the business;

B. Because there is money, the author expressed his / her desire to do so to do so to the inn, and thereby interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force over about 30 minutes, such as putting customers out of the cell phone by scaming music with a cell phone.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements (victims) made to E and D;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The portion dismissing the public prosecution in favor of the fact that there are no past records of crime more than 15 years of confession, confession, reflectivity, agreement, and recent 15 years of suspended execution under the conditions unfavorable to all kinds of violent crimes that amount to 26 times the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.

1. The Defendant, as to the facts charged of assault, will take the victim E (74 tax)’s desire to take the Defendant out of the restaurant and take care of him after going through the restaurant, at the time and place stated in the facts charged, such as the statement of the crime, and the victim E (74 tax) will take the Defendant’s desire to take the Defendant out of the restaurant.

E to the defective victim E “I do so as to do so as to do so, and nives;

In doing so, the part of the victim E's rear, chest and snow part was assaulted as drinking by drinking.

2. Determination

(a) applicable legal provisions - Article 260 of the Criminal Code;