logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2018.07.20 2018고단172
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 15, 2018, the Defendant was indicated in the facts charged against Victim D (F) in Gongju-si around 15:54 on March 15, 2018, while the facts charged are indicated as “F”, it is obvious that the Defendant is a clerical error, and thus, is corrected ex officio.

In the operation “E” restaurant, the head of the Tong, who was in possession, was asked to pay food to the victim D on credit after drinking alcohol and meat, but was rejected. The victim G (45 years old) visited the above restaurant at the time, who visited the above restaurant to the customer, was sprinked twice, and the victim G sprinked twice to report it to the police, and the victim G sprinked into the restaurant, followed the victim D's head, and sprinked the victim D's head by twice, and sprinked the victim D's head, sponsed the victim D's head, and sprinked the victim D's head, and continued to spick the victim's hand, and sprinked the victim's damage to the victim's horse.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim D, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment, and inflicted injury on the victim G, on the right side of the water surface, the water surface of the water surface, the surface of the water surface, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the time, place, as described in paragraph 1, and as described in paragraph 1, was able to take the DNA head debt and scam, and was subject to the control from the first police box belonging to the Gongju Police Station, dispatched after receiving the report from G, and assaulted the I’s face face at one time by Company A.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D, G, and I;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs of the case

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the applicable law and the choice of punishment.

arrow