A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 7, 2016, at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the following: 19:20 on the street in front of Dongdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, the Defendant: (a) was fluor of a high-ranking box C (V, 79 years old); (b) the fluor of a plastic box; (c) the fluor of a plastic box; (d) the fluor of a plastic box; and (e) the fluor of a dead wood tree owned by the victim D (V, 44 years old); and (b) the fluor of a cluor of a white tree, and (e) the fluor of a high-ranking mother.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying documents;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The part of dismissing the public prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. On June 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as an offender in the act of committing a crime set forth in paragraph (1) at the F District Office of the F District Office located in Ansan-dong Police Station located in Ansan-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, where three police officers belonging to the said district group were located; and (b) the Defendant: (c) caused the victim G, who is a police officer belonging to the said district group, to “YY, e.g., e., e.,

Along to approximately 30 minutes of “such as “A”, the victim was openly insultd by talking about a large amount of 30 minutes.

2. The offense of insult under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, shall be prosecuted only upon the complaint of the victim under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

In such a case, since the victim G cancelled the complaint against the defendant after the institution of the instant indictment, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act, the prosecution against insult of the facts charged in the instant case.