logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.10.19 2017고단1282
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 고단 1282] 피고인은 2017. 5. 6. 11:00 경 여수시 무선로 187 소재 롯데 마트 여천 점에서 물건을 고르던 중 직원들의 관리가 소홀한 틈을 이용하여 그 곳 상품 매장에 진열되어 있던 피해자 C이 관리하는 시가 126,090원 상당의 어린 대파 1 봉지, 참두릅 1 팩, 관 엽 용 영양제 2 상자, 쭈꾸미 3 팩, 당근 2개, 깐 대파 1 봉지, 크린랩 1개, 맥주 1 박스, 소주 5 병, 사이다 3 병 등을 휴대하고 있던 피고인의 가방에 몰래 넣어 가지고 가 절취하였다.

[2017 Highest 1878] On August 18, 2017, the Defendant went out of the store without calculating the amount of 1 salary of the total of 72,950 won for the side Kim 1 salary, 3 salary for the summer, 3 salary for the summer, 1 bottled, 1 bottled, 1 bottled, and two 1 boxes, etc. in the middle of the store.

The Defendant, at around 10:15 on the same day, stolen the Defendant, without calculating two sublimlimes equivalent to the total market value of KRW 27,800,00 in total, KRW 27,80,00, KRW 1 salary, 1 salary, 2 salary, 2 salary, 2 salary, and 5 income from the store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of CCTV photographs and damaged photographs to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Each of the instant crimes committed during the suspended execution period, even though each of the instant courts was sentenced to suspended execution on November 2016 and March 2017, as a similar case for the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes Act.

It is inevitable to sentence a thief even in consideration of the fact that victims do not want the punishment of the defendant and is not large in size.

In addition, the disease or economic difficulties of one defendant are the defendant.

arrow