The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On May 23, 2015, at around 14:40, the Defendant damaged the market price of the head of the house in the above law by reason of the following: (a) the Defendant’s husband reported that he was in the above law branch; (b) the Defendant’s husband was in the above law branch; (c) the Defendant opened the door of the above law branch; and (d) ruptures and ruptures, and ruptures and ruptures in the front of the law branch; and (d) ruptures and ruptures and ruptures in the front of the law branch.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine of 300,000 won for which the sentence is suspended; and

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The meaning of the suspended sentence: The effect of the suspended sentence is deemed to be acquitted after the lapse of two years from the date of receiving the suspended sentence (Article 60 of the Criminal Act). The invalidation of the suspended sentence is to be acquitted after the lapse of two years from the date of receiving the suspended sentence (Article 60 of the Criminal Act). The suspended sentence is to be imposed when a person who received the suspended sentence becomes subject to a judgment of suspension of qualification or more severe punishment, or when a prior conviction resulting in suspension of qualifications or more severe punishment is discovered during the period of the suspended sentence (Article 61 of the Criminal Act). The reason for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act is against his mistake in depth; the defendant has no record of being sentenced to the suspension of qualification or more severe criminal punishment; the defendant has committed the instant crime by separating the violence (this Court 2015B126) and the unfair treatment that the mother was committed by the victimized person, which is her husband, and the defendant has been indemnifiedly agreed with the victim and the victim, and the Defendant’s age, motive, means and consequence.