beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court 2014Na2034025 (No. 22, 2016)
Title
Whether the basic provisions on the imposition of fines for negligence can be considered as unconstitutional
Summary
The ground provisions for imposition of a fine for negligence cannot be deemed as unconstitutional, and the imposition of a fine for negligence on the plaintiff is legitimate on the ground that the plaintiff did not have any reason to deal with delayed issuance of cash receipts, although the plaintiff
Cases
2016Da209672 Undue gains
Plaintiff-Appellant
Park AA
Defendant-Appellee
Korea
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court on January 22, 2016 2014Na2034025
Imposition of Judgment
April 28, 2016
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Trial Procedure, and it is therefore dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.