logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.09.19 2018고단2652
화학물질관리법위반(환각물질흡입)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 11, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of KRW 3 million at the Suwon Fics Institute for the violation of the Chemicals Control Act (snesting hallucinogenic substances) on the violation of the Fics Control Act, and has the same record of force once more.

No person shall take in, inhale, or possess for this purpose any chemical substance that causes entertainment, hallucation, or anesthesia, any substance prescribed by Presidential Decree.

Defendant, from around 14:00 on July 8, 2018 to 15:35 on the same day, the Gu of Ansan-si.

C. At the Defendant’s residence in 102, he inhaled hallucinogenic substances in a way that scam frame containing scamn scam in vinyl paper with scams scam at the entrance of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a chemical appraisal report;

1. Article 59 subparagraph 6 of the Chemicals Control Act and Article 22 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting a crime.

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2017Da14488, Jan. 1, 201) (i.e., the defendant's previous convictions are two times a fine in 2017; the defendant's mother's mother reported the defendant to be aware of the crime of this case; the mother's mother was the mother's wife against the defendant; and the defendant was

arrow