Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 25, 2012, Defendant A received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 from the Incheon District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on July 31, 2013 to a fine of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the support of the Suwon Friwon method.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A

A. A. On May 25, 2017, the Defendant was driving a CSpo-type car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.085% from the 900-meter section to the leap apartment road located in the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Seoul, to the leap apartment road located in the same direction 330-lane 36 of the former reduction.

B. On May 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant: (b) had a police officer, instead of the Defendant, driven a vehicle on the ground of the police officer, on the ground that the Defendant: (c) stated that the Defendant would cause the same passenger to drive the vehicle B with the intent to conceal the driving of the vehicle as stated in the foregoing 1. Paragraph (1); (d) stated that B had a driver drive the vehicle on behalf of the Defendant.

The purpose of this article is to make false statements.

As a result, the defendant caused the person who driven B to escape from a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment by making the person who driven B speaks that the person who was aware of who was the police officer B.

2. Defendant B, while being aware of the fact that Defendant A had driven alcohol as described in the above 1. Paragraph, he driving his car as stated in the above paragraph (1) at the D office of the Incheon Southern Southern Police Station around 10:00 on May 31, 2017 to a policeman who is investigating the above case.

By making a false statement, A who commits a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment has been allowed to escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A report on the detection of drinking drivers, the notification of the results of regulating drinking driving, and the circumstantial statement of the driver;

1. Kakao Stockholm photographs and investigation reports (CCTV verification);

1. Previous Records: A written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A), investigation report (verification twice the suspect A drinking driving force), and summary order application of Acts and subordinate statutes 2.1.