The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, did not dump the victim’s breath.

B. In light of the legal principles, even if the defendant was sealed by the victim, the defendant's act constitutes self-defense since the victim first committed an act in which the victim attempted to detachedly by breathing breaths of the defendant.

C. The lower court’s sentence (three million won of fine) imposed on the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, (i) the victim made a relatively consistent statement from the investigative agency to the court below to the court below that “the defendant tried to move to F, was pushed to the victim’s seat, was pushed to the victim’s seat, and the defendant was pushed to the bus floor by cutting down the victim’s fat, was pushed to the victim’s defect that the victim attempted to occur again, and came to go beyond the bus floor,” and (ii) M also made a statement to the effect that the defendant was pushed back the victim who attempted to occur again after the defendant was pushed to the victim, and this is consistent with the victim’s statement, and (iii) H, I, and J also made a statement to the effect that it was consistent with the victim’s statement at the court below to the effect that the defendant was pushed to the victim and the defendant was pushed to the seat of the victim, and that the defendant stated that the victim was in front of the victim’s seat.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

3. In light of the background leading up to the occurrence of the instant case, the process of proceeding, the degree of injury inflicted by the victim, the relationship between the victim and the victim, etc. admitted by the above evidence judgment as to the misapprehension of the legal principle,