A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. In around 03:00 on July 5, 2016, the Defendant insultd the Defendant at “E” located on the first floor of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D underground, and “Intoxicated by a person under the influence of alcohol”.

“A police official who received a report and sent the victim F, who is a police official, made a public insult of the victim by stating that “In the situation where the proprietor and the customer are in a position, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by stating, “Is the same son, chron fe, this chron gue, Is the fero.”

2. On July 5, 2016, the Defendant signed a private signature: (a) at the Gangseo-gu Police Station Office located in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, for the suspicion of insult as described in paragraph (1), and was arrested as a current offender due to the suspicion of insult as described in paragraph (1) and was arrested as a suspect, and was under investigation as a suspect, the Defendant stated his/her relative G personal information as if he/she was his/her relative G; and (b) stated his/her “G” in the person who made a statement at the end of the suspect interrogation protocol as at the end of the interrogation protocol.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the G’s signature without authority for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. At the time and place indicated in paragraph 2, the Defendant: (a) submitted the protocol of suspect interrogation of a forged suspect to the head of the Gangseo-gu Police Station H and the head of the I police station affiliated therewith, who is aware of the forged circumstance, and exercised the signature of the above investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A second-time protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police in the G name;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

(1) Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 239(2) and Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising the above investigation signature)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the background and degree of each of the instant crimes, the circumstances in which the Defendant recognized his/her mistake, and other circumstances, the Defendant’s age and gender.