logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.05.04 2017고단3408
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 16, 2017, the Defendant forged the signature of a third party for the purpose of gathering the personal information of the Defendant, who was dispatched to the scene of the assault case, as if he were B, and committing as if he was the Defendant’s convict B. On November 14:46 of the same year, the Defendant was investigated at the Seogpo Police Station Office at Seopopo City 27 with caution and caution, and upon receiving the investigation at the C Team office, using the personal information of B, and then signing at the end of the suspect interrogation protocol with the intent of using B as “B” at the end of the suspect interrogation protocol.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), submitted to police officers in charge of not knowing the forgery of the above investigation protocol to the effect that the signature of the forged person was duly formed, thereby exercising the signature of the forged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. “Protocol of suspect interrogation,” which is forged by the person under consideration;

1. A criminal investigation report (the process of forging a signature of the suspect's company);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the background of recognition;

1. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 239 of the Criminal Act on the crime) and Article 239 (2) and Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act on the crime (the point of exercising the above investigation signature);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution have no record of being punished for the same kind of crime, the recognition of the crime and reflects on it, and other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing, such as the age, health status, environment, and circumstances after the crime, shall be taken into account, and the sentence shall

arrow