beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and two months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A, on March 27, 2013, was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of special larceny, etc. at the Incheon District Court, which was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 4, 2013, and Defendant B was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Incheon District Court on September 3, 2010 and completed the execution of the said punishment on January 18, 201
[2013 Highest 6637] Defendant A, along with D, E, and F, went to drive the said D, E, and F on July 13, 2013 with the victim I, who had been gameed in the above scambling room, “on-line telephone,” and the victim I, who had been engaged in the game in the above scambling room at around 14:56, Jul. 13, 2013. The victim, 3 mobile phones at the galtho city of the market price of 800,000,000 won from the above scambling room, and the above defendant got out of the above scambling room before the above scambling room.
Accordingly, the Defendant, together with the above D, E, and F, stolen the victim’s property.
[2014 Highest 87]
1. On July 2, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime of Defendant B: (a) borrowed a cell phone from the victim L on the street in front of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon; (b) lent the cell phone to the victim L; and (c) used it by lending S2 LE 1,00,000 won at the market price owned by the victim from the victim; and (d) fled with the aforementioned cell phone and stolen it.
2. The Defendants were able to flee from the way to use a mobile phone to middle students, etc. while they wanted to steal their cell phones.
On July 2, 2013, at around 20:45, the Defendants: (a) borrowed a mobile phone from Defendant B to the victim N; (b) used a pro rata G from the victim’s market price of KRW 900,000,00; and (c) changed the phone call from Defendant A; and (d) Defendant A used the aforementioned mobile phone.