beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 05:46 on July 23, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by 0.162% on blood alcohol content, and the Defendant driven a 24m BMW car from the 3rd parking column adjacent to the Busan Jinaro parking lot crop to the entrance of the said cropter.
2. The Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender as a flagrant offender at the time and place specified in Paragraph (1) as stated in Paragraph (1) at the time and place; and (b) issued a written confirmation of the suspect’s body body certificate under arrest and detention to E, who is aware of the fact that the written confirmation was duly completed to E, who is aware of the fact. In addition, the Defendant issued the written confirmation of the suspect’s body certificate under arrest and detention to E, who is not aware of the fact.
Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising, forged a letter of confirmation in the name of D, which is a private document related to the certification of facts, and a letter of physical confirmation of the arrested or detained suspect, and exercised it by issuing it.
3. In order to issue a drinking-free report, the Defendant, such as the date and time, place, and the time and place specified in Paragraph (1), C, who was a police officer regulating drinking driving, measured the Defendant’s drinking, and told the Defendant the resident registration number of D, who was a pro-born, to inquire the Defendant of his resident registration number for the purpose of causing him to handle business affairs, and mislead C into the fact by accessing the traffic police computer network to the policePDA, thereby allowing C to enter his personal information and measurement results, etc. in the drinking-free driver report, and then sign “D” on the said device after confirming the entry as above.
As a result, the defendant falsifies the special media records such as electronic records of others with regard to certificates of fact, and the notification of the results of drinking driving control, which is a prior recording of a forged person.