logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2010. 01. 20. 선고 2008누24707 판결
독립적으로 용역을 공급한 사업자인지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2007Guhap44511 ( August 12, 2008)

Case Number of the previous trial

National High Court Decision 2007west0393 (Law No. 29, 2007)

Title

Whether a business operator is an independent supplier of services;

Summary

The number of working days and daily allowances of other workers after receiving compensation from the company, which appears to have been paid in installments, is reasonable to deem that it is a subcontractor who has entered into a subcontract with the company.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the defendant revoked the disposition of imposition of value-added tax of 31,369,750 won for the first term of November 1, 2006 against the plaintiff, and of 35,078,210 won for the first term of 2004 and 1,002,520 won for the first term of 205.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasons for this decision are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, they are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow