logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2014.10.02 2014고정78
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant in the name of “D” in Incheon City C.

No person shall put a mark that may cause confusion as to the place of origin while cooking and selling a chickens subject to an indication of origin.

Nevertheless, on May 24, 2013 and May 28, 2014, the Defendant purchased Brazil 24km 112,800 won from the “F” located in Incheon-si, “F” and sold 22 km to many and unspecified customers as KRW 352,00,000. However, the Defendant prepared the said Brazil 22 km from May 24, 2014 to June 9, 2014, and sold 352,000 won by entering the origin of chickens in the place of business, but outside the place of business as “100% in Korea,” and “100% in Korea, in the advertisement leaflet,” and indicated the origin as “10% in Korea, which might cause confusion.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the advertisement electric complex to photographs and photographs of the scene of detection, the specifications of purchase of the hybrid chiller in Brazil;

1. Article 14 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6(1)1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Selection of a fine (the defendant has no record of punishment, and there are some circumstances that may be somewhat taken into account in the course of committing a crime).

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow