logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2017.09.28 2017고단370
변호사법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

122,520,00 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, around November 2014, was employed as the vice president in charge of the business of (State) D with access to the victim C, who is the actual operator of (State) D, and employed on April 2015 by the victim C, who was in charge of the business of (State) D. Around November 2014, the Defendant heard the statement that “The employees of the power plant intend to receive a coal conference from F, but the company of (State) being supplied to the existing (State) interferes with the conclusion of the supply contract between F and other companies,” and “I, who is the H of the company’s normal ledger of industry, is a university boarding, will be able to receive a coal supply conference from (State) D through I, through the above I, supply the Defendant’s oral promise to the effect that the Defendant would be supplied by D and its officers and employees.”

On April 30, 2015, the Defendant continued to receive a verbal promise from J (State) to supply coal conference to the Defendant (State), but failed to prepare a fixed contract, thereby making it difficult for the Defendant to enter into a contract with the Defendant “(State) F in order to enter into a contract with the Defendant.”

I must be personnel, and (State) D should be informed to the prosecutor who knows that the existing company that interferes with the conclusion of the contract with F and that is an existing company (state).

Accordingly, the victim C was transferred KRW 50 million to the corporate bank account (K) of Defendant C on the same day, stating that the expenses required therefor are changed to KRW 50 million.

As a result, the Defendant received KRW 50 million from the victim C on the pretext of solicitation for the execution of a contract for supply of coal conference to F, an institution affiliated with the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Self-Governing Department H, which is a public official, and on the pretext of solicitation for the investigation of corporate corruption cases handled by the public prosecutor.

arrow